viernes, 6 de septiembre de 2013

LUTHIER - an elegy

I'm pretty late with this, but things heated up for me soon after Casi walked on out of life.  Anyway, I loved the guy, and here's my elegy to Chris Caswell, my dear friend.



Luthier

            ~ for Cas

a gentle presence,
the kindest gaze,
filled with thoughts
and music:  casi.

and slow-moving –
a river of gentleness –
was this man, almost
an angel
whistling
while waiting for a bus
to somewhere else.

and nights at camp
the jokes, the stories,
his hands on the strings,
eyes that had seen much,
his heart open to all
like a rose
like a whole vase of roses
       opening.

still there is
(there will always be) that
picture of him
the cans on his ears
hands poised on the soundboard,
and when her words
hit the mic
he wept too:
a moment never forgot.

some will say that
the good die young
or die
too soon –
and that is only a bruised heart
wailing.
cas lived
a makeshift but oddly perfected
life:
a bit of wabisabi in every corner,
and a whistling wait.

the end was hard –
hard on us all
and on him too,
though he was peaceful
throughout.
he caught the glint
in my eye that last evening,
and only whispered
“what?”

“nothing,” i said, “just the music.”

                        ~ Hakim






David Hakim is an internationally-published journalist and award-winning author who has run several newspapers – and recently received a commendation for his short story That Man in the London Aesthetica Competition.  He can be reached at dhakim at earthlink.net


© 2013 Hakim - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED: use without profit allowed only with author’s express written permission. Please don't wake up my attorney. Please.
 

jueves, 22 de agosto de 2013

Imagine this



             I get so sick of listening to the so-called 'political debate' going on in this country, which is really little more than a dog-&-pony show between the most extroverted (and often the most socially uninhibited) specimens of each party.  And while the circus goes on and Joe Public has to fight for his bread, most of the people doing and making are ignorant of some of the most basic and most egregious invasions ofpersonhood going on around them.  (And going on between them, as they have become the instruments of this social injustice.)

             We know that Republicans and Democrats each represent an approximately equal portion of the voting public.  So imagine that either group, chosen at random, would be forced to behave in certain ways, forced to perform certain customs – starting as adolescents –  for the rest of their lives.   

Imagine that.  This is what it might look like:

All Democrats are indoctrinated – and coerced by pressure from peers, parents and other authority figures – to wear a facial mask of a definite pattern [comprising the coloring of specific features of the face] when in public, and even when in ‘private’ if dealing with close friends or members of one’s own family.

All Democrats are compelled by “social norms” to wear [in order to be accepted by other members of society, and so as not to be arrested] a specific piece of clothing – perhaps a pair of spandex shorts – under their clothing whenever in public, whether they need it or not.

All Democrats are subtly and surreptitiously taught to revere and emulate images in the popular press of other younger, fit and more socially ‘desirable’ Democrats – to measure themselves against these [often artificially-enhanced] images and to judge themselves extremely harshly on their success in achieving what are often futile goals.

All Democrats are expected to have perfect bodies, to fit a standard of physical perfection before they will be accepted socially.   They are also required to be physically attractive in order to be hired in the workplace – and are routinely denied employment because they do not fit a ‘standard of attractiveness.’

All Democrats are denied equality in the workplace by means of less pay, exclusion from certain jobs or entire fields of employment, and by the obstruction of advancement based on merit.

All Democrats are expected to work their normal jobs – for less pay than Republicans expect and receive – and, once back in their own homes, to cook, clean and take care of every other member of their families (including Republicans), performing menial acts of service without recompense or acknowledgment.

All Democrats are ‘given’ the opportunity to advance in society by trading their sexual abilities for money, either by marriage or by the outright commerce of selling their bodies for sex acts, sexually-oriented dancing, pornographic modeling or phone sex.

All Democrats are secretly – but universally – expected to be open to sexual advances by anyone (but especially Republicans), at any time, in any setting.  If they become victims of rape or other unwanted sexual aggression, Democrats are told that they ‘asked for it’ and are treated as social outcasts.

Democrats  – as a group – would not have been allowed to vote until well into the 20th Century, after more than 80 years of fighting for this most basic of rights.

Well, wouldn’t we all have a perfectly wonderful goddam time then?

Ok, ok, just to show that we aren't biased around this joint, here is the corollary imaginative picture:




Imagine this:

All Republicans are indoctrinated – and coerced by pressure from peers, parents and other authority figures – to wear a facial mask of a definite pattern [comprising the coloring of specific features of the face] when in public, and even when in ‘private’ if dealing with close friends or members of one’s own family.

All Republicans are compelled by “social norms” to wear [in order to be accepted by other members of society – and so as not to be arrested] a specific piece of clothing – perhaps a pair of spandex shorts – under their clothing whenever in public, whether they need it or not.

All Republicans are subtly and surreptitiously taught to revere and emulate images in the popular press of other younger, fit and more socially ‘desirable’ Republicans – to measure themselves against these [often artificially-enhanced] images and to judge themselves extremely harshly on their success in achieving what are often futile goals.

All Republicans are expected to have perfect bodies, to fit a standard of physical perfection before they will be accepted socially.   They are also required to be physically attractive in order to be hired in the workplace – and are routinely denied employment because they do not fit a ‘standard of attractiveness.’

All Republicans are denied equality in the workplace by means of less pay, exclusion from certain jobs or entire fields of employment, and by the obstruction of advancement based on merit.

All Republicans are expected to work their normal jobs – for less pay than Democrats expect and receive – and, once back in their own homes, to cook, clean and take care of every other member of their families (including Democrats), performing menial acts of service without recompense or acknowledgment.

All Republicans are ‘given’ the opportunity to advance in society by trading their sexual abilities for money, either by marriage or by the outright commerce of selling their bodies for sex acts, sexually-oriented dancing, pornographic modeling or phone sex.

All Republicans are secretly – but universally – expected to be open to sexual advances by anyone (but especially Democrats), at any time, in any setting.  If they become victims of rape or other unwanted sexual aggression, Republicans are told that they ‘asked for it’ and are treated as social outcasts.

Republicans – as a group – would not have been allowed to vote until well into the 20th Century, after more than 80 years of fighting for this most basic of rights.



Well, wouldn’t we all have a perfectly wonderful goddam time then?
 
See what I mean?  Sure you do.




David Hakim is an internationally-published journalist and award-winning author who has run several newspapers – and recently received a commendation for his short story That Man in the London Aesthetica Competition.  He can be reached at dhakim at earthlink.net


© 2012 Hakim - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED: use without profit allowed only with author’s express written permission. Please don't wake up my attorney. Please.


martes, 23 de julio de 2013

The Five Lies of Childhood




People are so unconnected to the real world, so much lost in the lies and deceit that they’ve  been fed that it’s any wonder anything can get done.  You can go to college and learn all kinds of stuff, all kinds of practical stuff, but when it comes to making decisions about the real stuff of life, they have you in their pocket because they got you believing in imaginary stuff from the time you were small.  And when you grow up, you have no reference for the realities of life, for the things that they didn’t want to talk to you about because they were lazy or they were scared or they were just plain stupid, or their parents did it to them.

They start in on you very early, while you’re still gullible.  They start lying to you when you start asking questions they can’t answer, like “Where did I come from?”

“Oh, honey – of course, the Stork brought you.”

And this is the perfect thing to start the trail of lies with – you’re a little dependent being, totally narcissistic, self-centered, and the fairy tale centers on you.  By the time they’re through with you, that story is in, and they’re off the hook with that question for a while.

And how do they do it?  They have this pictorial evidence of a cartoon stork holding, in its long (and dangerous) beak, a sheet folded into a little baby hammock.  Of course, it isn’t real evidence; it’s a cartoon and you can’t even see the baby in most of those pictures.  But you take in that picture and you think about coming down the chimney, and of course you think that the reason that they are so hard on you about staying clean is that the stupid stork couldn’t just drop you through a window onto a nice comfy chair – he (because you know that a female stork would take better care of a baby) had to drop you down the chimney and you probably landed in a big cloud of ash that messed up the carpet and left you all black and sooty.  So, with the combination of the cheerful ‘retelling’ of your ‘birth’ and the pictorial ‘evidence’ and the guilt for completely messing up their almost sacrosanct living room, you buy it and stop questioning, and they won’t have to deal with that question (or fix it) for another decade, if they’re lucky.

So you’re a helpless little kid, dependent on these Big People for everything, and you just swallowed your first Big Lie.  And this is a Big Lie, not like “Daddy’s not mad” or “You’re only at the babysitter for a half hour – Mommy will be home soon.”  This is a lie that will affect your life for a long time – not for your whole life (probably) but for a number of years at least.

And that’s the First Lie:  The Stork brought you, honey.

Ok, so they got you pretty good, but the hook’s not set – not yet.  So the next thing has to grab you, has to really have an effect on you to keep you believing the stuff they are feeding you.

And what will that be?  Well, appealing to your narcissism worked the first time, and the cute animal worked pretty well (and animals can’t betray the Big People because they can’t talk).  And what might grab you?  Your desire.  Sure, even at that young age, you have very strong wants.  They dangle something you want.  So here comes the Easter Bunny!  And look, he’s got brightly colored eggs that you can search for in a treasure hunt.  Boy, all that production value sure makes this seem important – and fun.  But what will make it even more fun?  Candy!  And you’re a kid – you want candy.

So, with your mouth full of candy and your face covered with chocolate, you get through the admittedly low-key holiday by means of the distraction of the hunt and the little windows in some of the eggs, and you’ve bought the lie again.

And that’s the Second Lie:  Aren’t you excited that the Easter Bunny is coming, sweetie?

But the Easter Bunny won’t work for too long.  And the reason is not that you are too smart for them, but that sooner or later you are going to come face to face with that imaginary character, and you will notice the shoddy costume, the fake eyes, the whole artifice of it all.  Where ‘pictorial evidence’ worked for the Stork story, they need more for the Easter Bunny tale, and pictorial evidence is thin, so they trot out someone’s dad or a hired actor – and sooner or later, one of the kids is gonna twig to the fact that this ain’t no real rabbit.  And part of the way that they strategize against that inevitability is by having you immediately help with the dyeing of the Easter eggs for the hunt just as soon as you start to doubt the Bunny.  And by this means, they've given their credibility a bump – they’ve admitted to mendacity while inviting your collusion at the same time:  “Well, wouldn’t it be fun to dye some Easter eggs?  And you can help hide them?  It’s for the little kids, after all.”

Now, let me divagate here for a moment before tackling the Third Big Lie, because we’ve come to one of the minor lies that feed this whole system of brainwashing kids:  Hallowe’en.

Hallowe’en also works on several levels with kids, because it involves things kids love – dressing up in costume, wandering around at night and playing pranks, knocking on strangers’ doors, and candy.  There is no great imaginary friend in the game, but the use of various ‘characters’ from the media and (less and less so) from literature brings a kind of surreal quality to the event that plays right into the whole ‘imaginary friend’ program that the Big People put on kids to brainwash them.  It goes like this:  “If we can play and have fun among a lot of people pretending to be whom they are not, then the kids won’t have as much trouble getting comfortable with imaginary beings in the conversation, and they will come to believe through a subtle transference.  And if some of those pretenses involve beings that clearly do not exist, then the kids will thus become indoctrinated to the entire idea of believing in things that don’t exist.”

Candy seems to play big in these lies our parents told us… at Easter, on Hallowe’en, and even on that lie-riddled Valentine’s Day (named after a guy whose own end was as messy as that garage on Clark Street in Chicago in 1929).  Candy.  And the unspoken thing about Hallowe’en is that the Big People have taught you the whole scheme of extortion, readying you a bit more for the life you will step into as an adult, in which you will need to learn to withhold in order to get what you want – and whether you are withholding good things or bad things, it’s still extortion.

Hallowe’en actually serves a viable purpose in this scheme to brainwash kids, because it presents the kind of contradictions that their lives will be filled with:  “Ok, we’re gonna go around as dead people – no, really dead people and ghosts, vampires, werewolves and all that – and we’re gonna knocks on doors and demand candy and people are gonna give it to us candy.”  There’s that candy again!  This mixing of treats and fun and dead people is another instance of the surreal creeping into events that the kids are actually involved in, but the negative aspects of this juxtaposition won’t come up til much later in life, when you’re all adults and you have to actually confront death,

And before we get too far ahead of ourselves on the life’s timeline, let’s get to the Third Big Lie.  So about six years old – as young as five for some kids and as old as seven for others – kids start losing their ‘baby teeth,’ the placeholders for their actual life-long teeth while the jaw is growing to a good size.  And with the loss of the first baby tooth, the next Big Lie makes her entrance:  the Tooth Fairy.

Again, we have an imaginary character in a little drama centered on the child – the child is the hero or heroine of the story, and the Tooth Fairy is the benefactor who makes all the pain and messiness of losing a tooth worth it.  The child is young enough to still believe in these things, and – because of the tall tale’s setup – there is no worrisome bunny costume, no need for pictorial evidence, because it all takes place while the child is asleep.  the Tooth Fairy makes her ‘appearance,’ but the only appearance that the child sees is the physical ‘evidence’ of a quarter or a dollar or whatever hush-money that the Big People leave under the pillow.  Voila – a kid who believes!   (Until the notion is shot down by some anarchist in the schoolyard.)

So there’s the Third Lie:  Don’t cry about that hurty tooth, honey – the Tooth Fairy will leave you some blood money!

And now we’re ready to look at the penultimate of the Big Lies of childhood:  Santa Clause.  Again, the ‘tradition’ we know is much diluted (or powerfully adulterated) from the original.  But for our purposes here, we can view the current tradition (or that of the recent past) and find another appeal to narcissism, paying of the desires of the kid, and candy.  Christmas (and Hanukkah), as celebrated in the secular world, introduces another aspect, one which the child is now advanced enough to assimilate and apply to the world at large:  greed.  The notion of a jolly old man who showers children with gifts is a powerful intoxicant to a greedy little kid, and one that will be apprehended as plausible without much examination – if only because of the effort involved in unwrapping all the much-desired presents. 

And part of the evidence, if all the hoopla of ‘the holidays’ isn’t enough for our little believer, then the actual and real embodiment of ‘Old Saint Nick’ in department stores is quite enough for children of a certain age.  Once the child gets the notion that all might be a bit askew (especially by the sight of all those bell-ringing St Nick’s in front of stores), it is a simple thing to smudge the picture a bit and gain a perhaps a whole year of gullibility out of the kid – Oh, he’s not the real Santa Clause; he’s one of Santa’s helpers, dressed up to look like Santa… for the little kids, you know?

And that’s the Fourth Lie:  You better behave yourself and be good – or Santa Clause isn’t going to bring you all those you want so much.

No wonder the shock of adolescence is so tough on kids – all those lies of childhood, spinning in the kid’s head doused with a cocktail of hormones and self-doubt.  But the kid is now ready to accept and believe all kinds of things, and the public schools have been feeding him a long line for a long time – Thanksgiving and the ‘helpful’ Indians, Washington’s cherry tree and dollar-across-the river, and al the other myths that Americans so diligently constructed for the last two-hundred-plus years to cover up the greed and rapacity and inhuman cruelty that could not be justified and so had to be whitewashed.

Jarion Monroe, in one of our conversations about the subject of childhood lies said, “I think  the progression of lies actually may be (rather than consecutive) more of an equally weighted net to capture  and pull the budding inquiring/formative mind into the miasma of belief; something which the scientific method keeps trying to counteract with its system of empirical proofs, which is very dangerous to the ruling families and their nouveau hangers-on.  I always come back to the power of greed, the driving engine for the thinly-disguised primal fear-of-death-as-remedied-or-ameliorated-by-accumulating-everything-in-sight.” [ital mine]

This net of deceit has for generations been brushed off as a ‘necessary evil’ when raising children… but that ‘explanation’ cannot excuse the behavior that has led to a largely ignorant and now diversion-addicted predominant culture.

Considering how many lies their teachers told children about America’s ongoing pageant of skewed and hypocritical political processes, it’s not surprising that the work of the parents colluded with those lies to form minds that could easily accept the blatantly false as if it were true. 

The ‘political conversation’ has turned into a travesty of thought and logic, after so many people have swallowed wholesale so many patent untruths about every aspect of our lives that the power to discern reality from fiction has faded to a feeble feint in the direction of sunshine as they fall back to a kind of walking sleep.  We have an electorate that is largely ignorant of its own history, of the diverse and rich cultures that gathered and coalesced into what is called the ‘melting pot’ (but would more accurately be called the ‘salad bowl’), of the kind of culture America has become, and of the lies that we all have been fed and willingly consume every day of our lives.

And technology has rendered modern life so busy (how long each day do you spend just deleting emails?) and so expensive that who cares anymore that Washington is a snake basket full of lying hypocrites (of both parties) and that our self-appointed ‘news’ outlets are using nonstop ‘bad news’ to covering up the real bad news each and every day?

Is there any hope?  There would be, in a generation or two, if only we would take the time to continue to educate ourselves, to provide more and better education for our children, to not let the politicians cut education spending – because we are falling far far behind ‘underdeveloped’ countries, and we need every good mind we can muster to even begin to solve the problems facing us in the coming years.

This little essay got pretty large, pretty fast, so I think we’ll quit hire for a while, and we’ll take a look at the Bi-polar Sky Wizard in the next installment, because he’s a whole couple of books by himselves. 





David Hakim is an internationally-published journalist and award-winning author who has run several newspapers – and recently received a commendation for his short story That Man in the London Aesthetica Competition.  He can be reached at dhakim at earthlink.net

© 2012 Hakim - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED: use without profit allowed only with author’s express written permission. Please don't wake up my attorney. Please.